Pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby report that I have issued an Executive Order taking further steps to deal with the threat posed by the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) increasing exploitation of United States capital to resource and to enable the development and modernization of its military, intelligence, and other security apparatuses which continue to allow the PRC to directly threaten the United States homeland and United States forces overseas, including by developing and deploying weapons of mass destruction, advanced conventional weapons, and malicious cyber-enabled actions against the United States and its people.
Through the national strategy of Military-Civil Fusion, the PRC increases the size of the country’s military-industrial complex by compelling civilian Chinese companies to support its military and intelligence activities. Those companies, though remaining ostensibly private and civilian, directly support the PRC’s military, intelligence, and security apparatuses and aid in their development and modernization. At the same time, they raise capital by selling securities to United States investors that trade on public exchanges both here and abroad, lobbying United States index providers and funds to include these securities in market offerings, and engaging in other acts to ensure access to United States capital. In that way, the PRC exploits United States investors to finance the development and modernization of its military.
To deal with that threat, I signed Executive Order 13959 on November 12, 2020. Executive Order 13959 prohibits certain purchases involving publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of any Communist Chinese military company. Those companies are ones the Department of Defense has listed, or will list, pursuant to section 1237 of Public Law 105-261, as amended, or are identified as Communist Chinese military companies or their subsidiaries by the Secretary of the Treasury using similar criteria.
Today, I signed an Executive Order amending Executive Order 13959. The amendments prohibit certain sales as well as purchases of publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of any Communist Chinese military company. They also prohibit possession of such securities by United States persons 1 year after a company is determined to be a Communist Chinese military company. And, finally, they allow the Secretary of Defense publicly to list whether a company is a Communist Chinese military company using the criteria in section 1237(b)(4)(B) of Public Law 105-261, as amended by section 1233 of Public Law 106-398 and section 1222 of Public Law 108‑375, regardless of whether the Secretary must report that determination under section 1237(b)(2).
I am enclosing a copy of the Executive Order I have issued.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/President-Trump-Letter-Thumb.jpg10801920The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-14 04:44:472021-01-14 11:59:51Letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate | The White House
The storming of the capital building was not a “failure of security” as multiple camera angles and videos show police letting protesters beyond the barricades and in some cases they march them right up to the front door!
The FBI was investigating a threat from Iran to fly a plane into the building on that same day, yet Joe Shmoe and Sally Soccermom were able to easily walk right in??!!
In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth proves that this entire incident was a setup by the state in an attempt to gain a tighter grip of control on the American people as we move closer to a Biden presidency in 2021.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23491-rvsEHXAVcUMVTaZylgULIVA6_640x360.jpg360640The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-14 03:25:342021-01-14 06:13:32YOU’RE BEING LIED TO! PROOF THE CAPITAL BUILDING “INSURRECTION” WAS A SET UP!
Surviving a Leftist government is never easy. This time it might almost be impossible with a confused old man controlled by radical Marxists and Globalists at the helm. With the total backing of Big Tech and the Mega Corporations, the Biden administration will be able to reek havoc on the constitution and vengeance on hard working Trump supporting Americans. It’s really not looking good for Patriots, Trump voters, Conservatives, Libertarians and freedom loving people everywhere. Without President Trump to hold back the storm, things are about to accelerate at exponential speed. Something which could leave a trail of devastation that will outweigh all previous tumultuous events in the turbulent history of western civilisation. Biden who will be President in name only, will be guided like an incontinent old uncle to the rest room while the pocket fillers and crazies run amok in government. As always in times of political turmoil, you the people need to be well prepared.
Readying Our Defences
We at The_Void have been busy putting contingency plans in place for the coming Radical-Leftist Rampage through our institutions and societies. We know whatever happens in America will very quickly spread around the western world and beyond. A highly probable outcome considering the ostensibly shared values and beliefs of western citizenry. Many wise old heads are predicting an economic apocalypse and complete societal collapse.
Everything Is On The Line
Pretty much everyone in the America First and freedom movement will know that if victory is to be achieved it will come at a massive cost. They also understand that there may be a lot of dark days ahead. So in appreciation of that old ‘Boy Scouts’ Moto,
Here are ten essential things you may need to survive the Biden administration.
A go-bag ready with survival equipment
Solar Charger and untraceable comms device
Cash (Chinese Yuan Not Dollars}
A carefully planned escape route avoiding Democrat States
A network of trusted friends (No Liberals – they will betray you if things get tough)
Multi band two-way analogue radio (Lefties can’t operate analogue devices)
Fake Covid-19 vaccination certification to blend in with Liberals (should be available on the dark web or from disgruntled doctors – of whom there will be many post Covid)
Pictures or video of a Democrat engaged in forbidden acts (if you need this you’re really in trouble and blackmail is your only way out – Fortunately all Dems are corrupt)
The phone number of a bent Obama appointed judge (readily available through the right channels)
A friend who’s owed a favour by the Clintons (a highly risky strategy this one, because of the Clinton’s proclivity to betray absolutely everyone)
Accepting The Obvious
Whilst we understand that all of these things are not going to available to everyone, its important to recognise the deep shit we are all in. There is now a high probability everything we know and love is about to go firmly down the Thomas Crapper. My old school teacher Edna Slushgate at North Harrow Preparatory School for Girls had a phrase for this,
“We’re up shits creek without a paddle or a boat my dear.”
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/external-content.duckduckgo-2.jpg470340Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-13 23:06:522021-01-14 18:35:01Surviving A Biden Administration | Henrietta H
Glenn Greenwald: How silicon valley, in a show of monopolistic force, destroyed Parler in a calculated attack.
Silicon Valley is the home of The Fourth Reich.
Greenwald’s excellent piece draws the stark contrast between the tech monopolies and successful new enterprises. Like every fascist that has gone before them, big tech crushes any opposition or threat to their business. It really is time for the public to abandon these sinister organisation and stand up for the individual and freedom. If not stopped now, who’s to say these tyrannical giants won’t be forming their own armies to crush us all.
Critics of Silicon Valley censorship for years heard the same refrain: tech platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter are private corporations and can host or ban whoever they want. If you don’t like what they are doing, the solution is not to complain or to regulate them. Instead, go create your own social media platform that operates the way you think it should.
The founders of Parler heard that suggestion and tried. In August, 2018, they created a social media platform similar to Twitter but which promised far greater privacy protections, including a refusal to aggregate user data in order to monetize them to advertisers or algorithmically evaluate their interests in order to promote content or products to them. They also promised far greater free speech rights, rejecting the increasingly repressive content policing of Silicon Valley giants.
Over the last year, Parler encountered immense success. Millions of people who objected to increasing repression of speech on the largest platforms or who had themselves been banned signed up for the new social media company.
As Silicon Valley censorship radically escalated over the past several months — banning pre-election reporting by The New York Post about the Biden family, denouncing and deleting multiple posts from the U.S. President and then terminating his access altogether, mass-removal of right-wing accounts — so many people migrated to Parler that it was catapulted to the number one spot on the list of most-downloaded apps on the Apple Play Store, the sole and exclusive means which iPhone users have to download apps. “Overall, the app was the 10th most downloaded social media app in 2020 with 8.1 million new installs,” reported TechCrunch.
It looked as if Parler had proven critics of Silicon Valley monopolistic power wrong. Their success showed that it was possible after all to create a new social media platform to compete with Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. And they did so by doing exactly what Silicon Valley defenders long insisted should be done: if you don’t like the rules imposed by tech giants, go create your own platform with different rules.
But today, if you want to download, sign up for, or use Parler, you will be unable to do so. That is because three Silicon Valley monopolies — Amazon, Google and Apple — abruptly united to remove Parler from the internet, exactly at the moment when it became the most-downloaded app in the country.
If one were looking for evidence to demonstrate that these tech behemoths are, in fact, monopolies that engage in anti-competitive behavior in violation of antitrust laws, and will obliterate any attempt to compete with them in the marketplace, it would be difficult to imagine anything more compelling than how they just used their unconstrained power to utterly destroy a rising competitor.
The united Silicon Valley attack began on January 8, when Apple emailed Parler and gave them 24 hours to prove they had changed their moderation practices or else face removal from their App Store. The letter claimed: “We have received numerous complaints regarding objectionable content in your Parler service, accusations that the Parler app was used to plan, coordinate, and facilitate the illegal activities in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021 that led (among other things) to loss of life, numerous injuries, and the destruction of property.” It ended with this warning:
To ensure there is no interruption of the availability of your app on the App Store, please submit an update and the requested moderation improvement plan within 24 hours of the date of this message. If we do not receive an update compliant with the App Store Review Guidelines and the requested moderation improvement plan in writing within 24 hours, your app will be removed from the App Store.
The 24-hour letter was an obvious pretext and purely performative. Removal was a fait accompli no matter what Parler did. To begin with, the letter was immediately leaked to Buzzfeed, which published it in full. A Parler executive detailed the company’s unsuccessful attempts to communicate with Apple. “They basically ghosted us,” he told me. The next day, Apple notified Parler of its removal from App Store. “We won’t distribute apps that present dangerous and harmful content,” said the world’s richest company, and thus: “We have now rejected your app for the App Store.”
It is hard to overstate the harm to a platform from being removed from the App Store. Users of iPhones are barred from downloading apps onto their devices from the internet. If an app is not on the App Store, it cannot be used on the iPhone. Even iPhone users who have already downloaded Parler will lose the ability to receive updates, which will shortly render the platform both unmanageable and unsafe.
In October, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law issued a 425-page report concluding that Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google all possess monopoly power and are using that power anti-competitively. For Apple, they emphasized the company’s control over iPhones through its control of access to the App Store. As Ars Technicaput it when highlighting the report’s key findings:
Apple controls about 45 percent of the US smartphone market and 20 percent of the global smartphone market, the committee found, and is projected to sell its 2 billionth iPhone in 2021. It is correct that, in the smartphone handset market, Apple is not a monopoly. Instead, iOS and Android hold an effective duopoly in mobile operating systems.
However, the report concludes, Apple does have a monopolistic hold over what you can do with an iPhone. You can only put apps on your phone through the Apple App Store, and Apple has total gatekeeper control over that App Store—that’s what Epic is suing the company over. . . .
The committee found internal documents showing that company leadership, including former CEO Steve Jobs, “acknowledged that IAP requirement would stifle competition and limit the apps available to Apple’s customers.” The report concludes that Apple has also unfairly used its control over APIs, search rankings, and default apps to limit competitors’ access to iPhone users.
Shortly thereafter, Parler learned that Google, without warning, had also “suspended” it from its Play Store, severely limiting the ability of users to download Parler onto Android phones. Google’s actions also meant that those using Parler on their Android phones would no longer receive necessary functionality and security updates.
It was precisely Google’s abuse of its power to control its app device that was at issue “when the European Commission deemed Google LLC as the dominant undertaking in the app stores for the Android mobile operating system (i.e. Google Play Store) and hit the online search and advertisement giant with €4.34 billion for its anti-competitive practices to strengthen its position in various of other markets through its dominance in the app store market.”
The day after a united Apple and Google acted against Parler, Amazon delivered the fatal blow. The company founded and run by the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos, used virtually identical language as Apple to inform Parler that its web hosting service (AWS) was terminating Parler’s ability to have AWS host its site: “Because Parler cannot comply with our terms of service and poses a very real risk to public safety, we plan to suspend Parler’s account effective Sunday, January 10th, at 11:59PM PST.” Because Amazon is such a dominant force in web hosting, Parler has thus far not found a hosting service for its platform, which is why it has disappeared not only from app stores and phones but also from the internet.
On Thursday, Parler was the most popular app in the United States. By Monday, three of the four Silicon Valley monopolies united to destroy it.
With virtual unanimity, leading U.S. liberals celebrated this use of Silicon Valley monopoly power to shut down Parler, just as they overwhelmingly cheered the prior two extraordinary assertions of tech power to control U.S. political discourse: censorship of The New York Post’s reporting on the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, and the banning of the U.S. President from major platforms. Indeed, one would be hard-pressed to find a single national liberal-left politician even expressing concerns about any of this, let alone opposing it.
Not only did leading left-wing politicians not object but some of them were the ones who pleaded with Silicon Valley to use their power this way. After the internet-policing site Sleeping Giants flagged several Parler posts that called for violence, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez asked: “What are @Apple and @GooglePlay doing about this?” Once Apple responded by removing Parler from its App Store — a move that House Democrats just three months earlier warned was dangerous anti-trust behavior — she praised Apple and then demanded to know: “Good to see this development from @Apple. @GooglePlay what are you going to do about apps being used to organize violence on your platform?”
The liberal New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg pronounced herself “disturbed by just how awesome [tech giants’] power is” and added that “it’s dangerous to have a handful of callow young tech titans in charge of who has a megaphone and who does not.” She nonetheless praised these “young tech titans” for using their “dangerous” power to ban Trump and destroy Parler. In other words, liberals like Goldberg are concerned only that Silicon Valley censorship powers might one day be used against people like them, but are perfectly happy as long as it is their adversaries being deplatformed and silenced (Facebook and other platforms have for years banned marginalized people like Palestinians at Israel’s behest, but that is of no concern to U.S. liberals).
That is because the dominant strain of American liberalism is not economic socialism but political authoritarianism. Liberals now want to use the force of corporate power to silence those with different ideologies. They are eager for tech monopolies not just to ban accounts they dislike but to remove entire platforms from the internet. They want to imprison people they believe helped their party lose elections, such as Julian Assange, even if it means creating precedents to criminalize journalism.
World leaders have vocally condemned the power Silicon Valley has amassed to police political discourse, and were particularly indignant over the banning of the U.S. President. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, various French ministers, and especially Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador all denounced the banning of Trump and other acts of censorship by tech monopolies on the ground that they were anointing themselves “a world media power.” The warnings from López Obrador were particularly eloquent:
Even the ACLU — which has rapidly transformed from a civil liberties organization into a liberal activist group since Trump’s election — found the assertion of Silicon Valley’s power to destroy Parler deeply alarming. One of that organization’s most stalwart defenders of civil liberties, lawyer Ben Wizner, toldThe New York Times that the destruction of Parler was more “troubling” than the deletion of posts or whole accounts: “I think we should recognize the importance of neutrality when we’re talking about the infrastructure of the internet.”
Yet American liberals swoon for this authoritarianism. And they are now calling for the use of the most repressive War on Terror measures against their domestic opponents. On Tuesday, House Homeland Security Chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) urged that GOP Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley “be put on the no-fly list,” while The Wall Street Journal reported that “Biden has said he plans to make a priority of passing a law against domestic terrorism, and he has been urged to create a White House post overseeing the fight against ideologically inspired violent extremists and increasing funding to combat them.”
So much of this liberal support for the attempted destruction of Parler is based in utter ignorance about that platform, and about basic principles of free speech. I’d be very surprised if more than a tiny fraction of liberals cheering Parler’s removal from the internet have ever used the platform or know anything about it other than the snippets they have been shown by those seeking to justify its destruction and to depict it as some neo-Nazi stronghold.
Parler was not founded, nor is it run, by pro-Trump, MAGA supporters. The platform was created based in libertarian values of privacy, anti-surveillance, anti-data collection, and free speech. Most of the key executives are more associated with the politics of Ron Paul and the CATO Institute than Steve Bannon or the Trump family. One is a Never Trump Republican, while another is the former campaign manager of Ron Paul and Rand Paul. Among the few MAGA-affiliated figures is Dan Bongino, an investor. One of the key original investors was Rebekah Mercer.
The platform’s design is intended to foster privacy and free speech, not a particular ideology. They minimize the amount of data they collect on users to prevent advertiser monetization or algorithmic targeting. Unlike Facebook and Twitter, they do not assess a user’s preferences in order to decide what they should see. And they were principally borne out of a reaction to increasingly restrictive rules on the major Silicon Valley platforms regarding what could and could not be said.
Of course large numbers of Trump supporters ended up on Parler. That’s not because Parler is a pro-Trump outlet, but because those are among the people who were censored by the tech monopolies or who were angered enough by that censorship to seek refuge elsewhere.
It is true that one can find postings on Parler that explicitly advocate violence or are otherwise grotesque. But that is even more true of Facebook, Google-owned YouTube, and Twitter. And contrary to what many have been led to believe, Parler’s Terms of Service includes a ban on explicit advocacy of violence, and they employ a team of paid, trained moderators who delete such postings. Those deletions do not happen perfectly or instantaneously — which is why one can find postings that violate those rules — but the same is true of every major Silicon Valley platform.
Indeed, a Parler executive told me that of the thirteen people arrested as of Monday for the breach at the Capitol, none appear to be active users of Parler. The Capitol breach was planned far more on Facebook and YouTube. As Recodereported, while some protesters participated in both Parler and Gab, many of the calls to attend the Capitol were from YouTube videos, while many of the key planners “have continued to use mainstream platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.” The article quoted Fadi Quran, campaign director at the human rights group Avaaz, as saying: “In DC, we saw QAnon conspiracists and other militias that would never have grown to this size without being turbo-charged by Facebook and Twitter.”
And that’s to say nothing of the endless number of hypocrisies with Silicon Valley giants feigning opposition to violent rhetoric or political extremism. Amazon, for instance, is one of the CIA’s most profitable partners, with a $600 million contract to provide services to the agency, and it is constantly bidding for more. On Facebook and Twitter, one finds official accounts from the most repressive and violent regimes on earth, including Saudi Arabia, and pages devoted to propaganda on behalf of the Egyptian regime. Does anyone think these tech giants have a genuine concern about violence and extremism?
So why did Democratic politicians and journalists focus on Parler rather than Facebook and YouTube? Why did Amazon, Google and Apple make a flamboyant showing of removing Parler from the internet while leaving much larger platforms with far more extremism and advocacy of violence flowing on a daily basis?
In part it is because these Silicon Valley giants — Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple — donate enormous sums of money to the Democratic Party and their leaders, so of course Democrats will cheer them rather than call for punishment or their removal from the internet. Part of it is because Parler is an upstart, a much easier target to try to destroy than Facebook or Google. And in part it is because the Democrats are about to control the Executive Branch and both houses of Congress, leaving Silicon Valley giants eager to please them by silencing their adversaries. This corrupt motive was made expressly clear by long-time Clinton operative Jennifer Palmieri:
It has not escaped my attention that the day social media companies decided there actually IS more they could do to police Trump’s destructive behavior was the same day they learned Democrats would chair all the congressional committees that oversee them.
The nature of monopolistic power is that anti-competitive entities engage in anti-trust illegalities to destroy rising competitors. Parler is associated with the wrong political ideology. It is a small and new enough platform such that it can be made an example of. Its head can be placed on a pike to make clear that no attempt to compete with existing Silicon Valley monopolies is possible. And its destruction preserves the unchallengeable power of a tiny handful of tech oligarchs over the political discourse not just of the United States but democracies worldwide (which is why Germany, France and Mexico are raising their voices in protest).
No authoritarians believe they are authoritarians. No matter how repressive are the measures they support — censorship, monopoly power, no-fly lists for American citizens without due process — they tell themselves that those they are silencing and attacking are so evil, are terrorists, that anything done against them is noble and benevolent, not despotic and repressive. That is how American liberals currently think, as they fortify the control of Silicon Valley monopolies over our political lives, exemplified by the overnight destruction of a new and popular competitor.
Parler CEO John Matze says, there is now a high probability that Parler will never return.
The Tech giants have literally murdered the best social media platform the net.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/IMG_1249.png575862Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-13 11:59:232021-01-15 03:59:57Why The Fascists of Silicon Valley Murdered Parler | Glenn Greenwald
This is what the leftists, along with those that support their agenda, think about Americans. It’s in their own words. Believe them when they say it.
“Americans are so fucking dumb,” said PBS Principal Counsel Michael Beller, who was chatting with one of Project Veritas‘ undercover self-described guerilla journalists. “You know most people are dumb.”
Beller is just saying what I would hear over and over again in Washington D.C. parties and pubs. He’s not the exception and his disdain for our nation makes my stomach turn because he, and others like him, are seizing power from the people every day. They hold positions of power that actually can affect our daily lives and that of our children.
And to think PBS if funded with our taxpayer dollars.
“Kids who are growing up, know nothing but Trump, for four years, you’ve got to wonder what they’re (Trump supporting children) going to be like, ” Beller told the undercover journalist. “They’ll (Trump supporters) be raising a generation of intolerant, horrible people – horrible kids.”
Beller suggests removing the children from parents who supported Trump and then sending them to enlightenment camps.
IS BELLER FOR REAL!
This idea is similar to what is actually happening in China, as the Chinese Communist Party has been terrorizing and removing the Uighur Muslim population to supposed “re-education” camps.
Beller needs to be fired by PBS. My daughter watches PBS and she won’t be anymore. This is absolutely intolerable.
Oh, Beller also said that if “even if Biden wins, we go for all the Republican voters, Homeland Security will take their children away…”
Folks, welcome to America’s worst nightmare.
BREAKING: @PBS Principal Counsel Michael Beller Incites Political Violence In Radical Left-Wing Agenda
“Go to the White House & throw Molotov cocktails…”
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23400-pbs20lawyer.PNG394700Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-12 18:31:212021-01-13 02:58:20So it Begins… Concentration Camps For Trump Voters | Sara Carter
9/11, 7/7, it’s standard operating procedure | The_Void
Pentagon held table-top contingency response exercise on morning of Capitol breach.
Pentagon officials held a table-top planning exercise the morning of Jan. 6 to rehearse how the Defence Department might respond to events that day in Washington, D.C., defence officials confirmed. The exercise was held some two hours before Capitol Police ordered the evacuation of the besieged U.S. Capitol complex.
“The table-top was requested by the highest levels inside the Department of Defence,” one official said. “The two top guys — Miller and Milley — were part of this.” The comment references acting Secretary of Defence Christopher Miller, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.
Table-top exercises are widely used within the U.S. military and other organisations to simulate emergency situations, and to assign roles and look for gaps in plans and procedures.
The Jan. 6 exercise was held after Miller and Milley examined the Defence Department’s plan to support local law enforcement agencies, according to a Pentagon memo.
Miller and Milley requested the exercise at 8:30 a.m., according to a memorandum from Miller’s executive secretary, Navy Capt. David Soldow. Three hours later, the exercise commenced.
“1130: [Miller] participates in table-top exercise regarding DoD contingency response options,” Soldow wrote in the memo bearing a date with the typographical error of Jan. 00.
Neither the Pentagon official nor Soldow revealed specific details about the exercise. But, the official noted: “You don’t need a table-top to see that things went downhill fast.”
In the wake of the Capitol siege that resulted in death, injury, arrests, and destruction of property, blame has been cast at various agencies and officials for failing to prevent and repel the violent assault. Steven Sund, who resigned as chief of the Capitol Police shortly after the Capitol breach, has said that his pleas for backup were rebuffed by House and Senate security officials and a Pentagon commander.
“If we would have had the National Guard, we could have held them at bay longer, until more officers from our partner agencies could arrive,” Sund told the Washington Post.
But in the days leading up to Jan. 6, Soldow wrote, Sund’s agency twice said it did not need help from the National Guard.
On Jan. 3, “DoD confirms with U.S. Capitol Police that there is no request for support,” Soldow wrote. On Jan. 4, he added, Capitol Police “confirms there is no requirement for DoD support in a phone call with [Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy].”
The situation at the Capitol had turned dire by 1:26 p.m. on Wednesday, when Sund’s agency ordered the evacuation of the building complex. The desperate call for help came at 1:59 p.m., according to the Pentagon memo. “Chief Sund communicates request for immediate assistance,” Soldow wrote.
“At that point, bureaucracy kicked into gear,” the defence official told Just the News.
The sequence of events that eventually brought the National Guard to help the embattled Capitol Police will be the subject of intense official scrutiny.
Miller has declared support for how his people addressed the Jan. 6 mayhem.
“In the midst of this tragedy, I was proud of the professionalism of our Department of Defence personnel,” Miller said in a statement. “I want to specifically recognise the service of the District of Columbia National Guard. They performed with honour, integrity and alacrity to protect people and property from unlawful acts.”
President Donald Trump on Monday declared an emergency in Washington, D.C., and ordered federal assistance in advance of the Jan. 20 inauguration of Joe Biden. Additionally, 15,000 National Guard soldiers and airmen have been authorised to stand duty in various capacities inside the District, according to the National Guard Bureau.
The plans include more table-top exercises regarding contingency response options, the defence official said.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/23386-tabletopX.jpg6281200Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-12 16:34:522021-01-12 16:41:37Smells Like False Flag | Just The News
The events of Wednesday at the Capitol achieved a Jackpot for the Political Left.
The televised discussion and debate, in the Joint Session of Congress, about vote fraud, was derailed.
When Congress reconvened, at night, no one had the stomach to vigorously assert that Trump won the election. No one cared anymore. The viewing audience, if there was one, couldn’t have cared, either. 100% of the attention was on the Capitol break-in.
Trump himself was welded to the “shocking assault” on the Capitol. The media made sure of that.
“January 6th, 2021, is a day that will live in infamy forever…” “The day Trump betrayed America.” “He whipped up his supporters in a frenzy, and then they invaded The People’s House…”
The media will play this tune for the next 20 years. One aim? To destroy any chance Trump can come back in 2024 to run for the presidency. To completely snuff out his future—or the future of his son, Donald, Jr.—in politics.
Another aim? To discredit all Trump supporters and cast them as violent lunatics.
Even the shooting death of a Trump supporter inside the Capitol, by the police, is subliminally implied as
“a necessary action to stop a revolution-in-progress.”
There is more. Efforts to protest the COVID lockdowns will be equated, by the media and the government, with the Capitol assault.
“It’s all the same thing, the same unhinged people, the crazed deplorables and the dangerous anti-vaxxers…”
New rounds of brutal COVID lockdowns will be justified on the basis that
“there are violent groups in our country who don’t care about infecting other people with the virus. You know who they are. Many of them wear MAGA hats. There is only one way to defeat this pandemic. Shelter in place long enough, until it’s over…”
Media, of course, conveniently ignore the months of violent Antifa-led riots, violence, and crime. Media will continue to bury those events behind a wall of outrage against the Capitol break-in.
“dissenting behavior” are now on the table as a National Security issue. “We must approach certain kinds of dissent as acts of war. Look at the attack on the very core of our Republic, the Congress of the People, at the Capitol building. That began as simple angry rhetoric, but it built into an attempt at ‘violent overthrow’…”
What’s happening now has parallels to the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995. At the time, I wrote about that false flag extensively. There had been a great deal of anti-government sentiment in the country. There was talk of secession. On both the Left and the Right, decentralization of power was a prominent issue. Media were focused on
“the dangers of right-wing militia groups.”
Then, after the explosion—which was far more sophisticated than an ANFO truck bomb—President Bill Clinton gave a key speech in which he basically said,
“Come home to the federal government. We will protect you.”
Aided by an outpouring of media praise for the speech, Clinton won the day.
Biden will now try the same thing. He has no rhetorical skills, but he will play the peacemaker and the unifier.
“It’s time to heal wounds. The nation can’t survive in this climate of divisiveness and hatred. We must make peace with our brothers and sisters. Come home to the government…”
However, the level of government surveillance and tracking will escalate—not only because of COVID, but (we’ll be told) in order to make sure another “January 6th” does not occur again.
Translation: we need to copy the Chinese model of control.
The Capitol break-in is a MAJOR covert op. And like all such staged events, the planned after-effects are the most important pieces.
Think of these effects as a gigantic “equals sign” planted in the public mind. The CAPITOL BREAK-IN equals dissent equals protests against the lockdowns equals Trump the betrayer equals anti-vaxxers equals MAGA equals nationalism equals outrage against lockdown governors equals people who don’t wear masks equals racism…
That’s how propaganda is done. By connecting one reaction to other reactions, across the board.
Imagine a Trump supporter who lives in a blue state. He looks in his closet today, and sees his MAGA hat and American flag…and wonders what will happen if he puts on that hat and walks down the street…
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/image-24.jpeg8001200The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-11 05:45:222021-01-13 17:21:05False flag at the Capitol: it’s all about the effects and after-shocks | Jon Rappoport
The Fascists Take Control of all Neurological Pathways.
They own what you think | The_Void
The President must not be allowed to speak to the people. A similar thing happened during the French Revolution to Maximilien Robespierre, back then they shot him in the mouth. It is perceivable that this bloody period in western history could repeat itself in the present day.
Never have we felt more pessimistic about the future than we do today. The set-up and vilification of the greatest President in living memory has been nothing short of evil. It’s almost as though Satan has won and now controls the world.
Twitter silences the sitting President of The United States of America
These big tech Oligarchs understand how social media has become essential for many aspects of daily life and it’s that crucial element they’ll exploit to moderate and control us.
The Chinese social credit system has given these elites so many ideas and insights into how easy it is to remove peoples hope and destroy resistance. Banking will be the next the stop for these power mad castigators, after that we’ll all have the same rights as lab rats.
I know many people are still hanging on to the hope of a last minute reprieve from the madness, but we have to recognise the peril and organise. We have to find alternative ways to communicate, because I can’t see the likes of Parler lasting much longer now that they’re firmly in the sights of the globalist tech tyranny. These are crucial days for the survival of freedom loving people. We have to stay in touch.
I wonder if Orwell ever really believed that ‘thought crime’ could happen in western democratic societies?
His dystopian vision has turned into the template of terror being waged on all conservative thinkers and non conformists.Philip K Dick got even closer with his visions of our dystopian future. Fahrenheit 451 by American writer Ray Bradbury nailed it.
Thought is our personal property until thought is a crime.
Wealth has become power not democracy.
A few people own the world.
This destruction was planned
Many literary greats have painted nightmarish visions of the future.
None of them thought they would come true. Almost all thought human progression was inexorable and unstoppable. How wrong they were. Our demise has been simple; Turn us all against each other and control the survivors. The untouchables can never be got at. Fuckerberg and Bezos both employ private armies full highly trained special forces. They live in impenetrable facilities. Often on islands, always behind the highest security it’s possible to achieve. ‘The secret rulers of the world.’
People are silenced when power fears what they say. It has been the same with tyrannies throughout history, If they can control what you say then they can control what you think. They can make you believe a man with a beard is a child. A woman is a man. Good people are evil. Corrupt people have your best interests at heart. That the greedy are philanthropists. It’s a simulation. A false paradigm. A conjuring trick. And it works all too often. Zuckerberg and Dorsey are not good people who care about humanity, they’re super rich elites who have no other compunction than to save everything for themselves.
It seems we are entering another dark period in human history.
As we write we no longer know how long our newsfeed will be available – surely its only a matter of time until they come for us like they’re coming for everyone else. We sometimes wonder if they’ll come for us personally. We wonder if they’ll come for our families. All we know is that we will go down still defying these horrendous fascists.
The speed with which people are being disappeared and silenced is breathtaking.
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The_Void-Censored-Stamp.jpg13332000Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-09 01:20:142021-01-11 17:39:45The Night Of The Long Knives | Opinion
As a result of the unprecedented and ongoing violent situation in Washington, D.C., we have required the removal of three @realDonaldTrump Tweets that were posted earlier today for repeated and severe violations of our Civic Integrity policy. https://t.co/k6OkjNG3bM
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The_Void-Twitter-Icon.jpg10801080The Managerhttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgThe Manager2021-01-08 17:03:112021-01-11 18:09:09Twitter Safety: “We have required the removal of three @realDonaldTrump Tweets that were posted earlier today.”
ABC News Hack calls for ‘Cleansing’ America Of Trump Supporters.
In a column and tweet (posted Today) ABC’s political director and top brown coat Rick Klein basically called for the genocide of Trump voters (all 75 million of them) after yesterday’s pro-democracy, pro-Trump, anti-voter fraud protests inside the halls of Congress.
(This tweet has now been deleted).
After getting badly ratio’d, the cowardly would-be gas chamber guard immediately deleted his fascist tweet. This is exactly the type of person tyrannical regimes employ to justify their heinous acts.
The psychopath went on to say,
“Even aside from impeachment and 25th Amendment talk, Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part,”
Klein wrote in his popular blog.
“Cleansing the movement he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else,”
he added, drawing conclusions that it sounded a little bit too much like Adolf Hitler in his heyday.
‘Cleansing’ was a very deliberate choice of words and the connotations it brings need no explaining. Those with good survival instincts know something very dark is coming.
During the entire four years of his presidency, the Fake News have called President Trump an authoritarian and a fascist. As you can see from this… It is nothing more than Projection. Pure and simple.
This is how the Marxists behave now, wait until they get power…
https://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/22930-Rick-Klein.jpg420624Robohttps://www.thevoid.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/PF-Logo-Black-02.svgRobo2021-01-08 15:34:512021-01-08 19:55:20ABC News Hack Talks About The Genocide of Trump Supporters | Opinion